Legislation Details

File #: 26-0642    Version: 1 Name:
Type: General Business Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/10/2026 In control: City Commission Regular Meeting
On agenda: 6/9/2026 Final action:
Title: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Initiating Eminent Domain for 30 Parcels Located Within the Natural Corridor Between the Little Salt Spring and Myakkahatchee Creek (Spring Haven Drive Area).
Attachments: 1. Presentation, 2. Property Ownership Map, 3. Greenway Corridor Map, 4. Greenway Corridor Bottleneck Map, 5. Spring Haven Drive Land Nomination
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Initiating Eminent Domain for 30 Parcels Located Within the Natural Corridor Between the Little Salt Spring and Myakkahatchee Creek (Spring Haven Drive Area).
___________________________________________________________________________

Recommended Action

To provide direction to staff regarding the use of eminent domain to acquire 30 privately owned parcels within the natural corridor between the Little Salt Spring and the Myakkahatchee Creek (Spring Haven Drive Area).

City Commission Options

Option 1: Provide direction to staff to pursue eminent domain to acquire the 30 privately owned parcels within the natural corridor between Little Salt Spring and the Myakkahatchee Creek.

* Pros:
o Ensures long term protection of a critical ecological and cultural corridor.
o Eliminates uncertainty created by stalled negotiations and fragmented ownership.
o Prevents future incompatible development that could sever connectivity.
o Provides a clear, enforceable path to secure land needed for public benefit.
o Strengthens the City's ability to implement adopted plans and conservation goals.
o Creates a consistent management framework across all parcels in the corridor.
o Subject to the availability of funds and project priorities, the acquisition initiative could be funded by the Environmental Protection Fund.

* Cons:
o May generate public concern or opposition from affected property owners.
o Will require significant staff time for legal coordination and case preparation.
o Legal challenges to eminent domain could extend the timeline acquisition or result in a determination that the project lacks legitimate public use or other outcome preventing acquisition.
o May set a precedent that influences expectations for future acquisitions.

Option 2: Do not provide staff direction to pursue eminent domain to a...

Click here for full text