Legislation Details

File #: RES. NO. 2026-R-20    Version: 1 Name: Toledo Blade Center Special Exception SPX-23-053 (QUASI JUDICIAL)
Type: Resolution Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/20/2026 In control: City Commission Regular Meeting
On agenda: 4/21/2026 Final action: 4/21/2026
Title: A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of North Port, Florida, Granting a Special Exception to Allow a Multi-Family Residential Use Located Generally at the Southeast Corner of South Toledo Blade Boulevard and Woodhaven Drive, in the Commercial General (CG) Zoning District Pursuant to the City of North Port Unified Land Development Code Section 53-40 and 53-259; Providing for Incorporation of Recitals; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for Severability; and Providing an Effective Date.(QUASI-JUDICIAL)
Attachments: 1. Aggrieved Party Quasi-Judicial Body Ruling Required Findings, 2. Resolution No. 2026-R-20, 3. Staff Report with Exhibits, 4. Staff Presentation, 5. PZAB Action Report, 6. Exparte through April 20, 2026, 7. Aggrieved Party - Morrison, 8. Aggrieved Party Updated - Morrison, 9. JM Planning and Development Letter
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

TITLE: A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of North Port, Florida, Granting a Special Exception to Allow a Multi-Family Residential Use Located Generally at the Southeast Corner of South Toledo Blade Boulevard and Woodhaven Drive, in the Commercial General (CG) Zoning District Pursuant to the City of North Port Unified Land Development Code Section 53-40 and 53-259; Providing for Incorporation of Recitals; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for Severability; and Providing an Effective Date.


Recommended Action

Option 1: Deny Resolution No. 2026-R-20.


City Commission Options

Option 1: Deny Resolution No. 2026-R-20.

* Pros: Denial of the resolution aligns with the findings that this special exception petition does not meet all of the 16 standards listed in Section 53-259.A(3) of the Unified Land Development Code, reduces land available for non-residential development, is not consistent with the comprehensive plan, does not provide the maximum economic benefit to the city, and does not provide adequate transportation improvements.

* Cons: Staff identifies no disadvantages to denying the resolution.

Option 2: Approve Resolution No. 2026-R-20.

* Pros: Approval of the resolution adds an additional 155 units to the city's multi-family housing stock.

* Cons: Approves a special exception request that reduces land available for nonresidential development, is not consistent with the comprehensive plan, does not provide the maximum economic benefit to the city, and does not provide adequate transportation improvements.

Background Information

On March 17, 2023, Nicola Tavernese, of Tavorb, LLC, the property owner, submitted a written petition request for a special exception to authorize a multifamily residential use development with a maximum of 155 dwelling units, with an amenity area and pool on a 10.34-acre portion of a parcel locate...

Click here for full text