future land use, estimated costs for improvements, land acquisition, mobility improvement
sources including the City, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Long-Range
Estimates (LRS), and FDOT Structures Manual (SM), North Port Land for Sale price list
using Zillow.com, project prioritization for short-, mid-, and long-term, Scenario 1 (with all
improvements) Plan Cost Estimation, Scenario 2 (without Price Boulevard Phase III
project), mobility fee methodology including growth estimates in vehicle miles, Existing
Conditions Evaluation factor (ECEf), Increase in Person Miles of Travel (PMTi), Capacity
Addition Ratio (CAR), Person Miles of Capacity Rate (PMCr), Person Travel Demand per
use (PTDu), and mobility fee per use (MFu), proposed Impact Fee schedule, person travel
demand by use, trip generation source, Commission direction for mobility fees inside or
outside Activity Centers, Scenario 1 and 2 proposed Mobility Fee Schedule (MFS) drafts,
and the proposed Scenarios including the calculated mobility fee percentage increase.
Alex Anaya, Consultant with Engineering Science Research Planning (ESRP)
Corporation, answered questions regarding current rates and the upcoming rate increase
in Hillsborough County.
Mr. Speake continued the presentation to include Scenarios 1 and 2 mobility fee
comparisons between the City and surrounding municipalities and the adoption hearing
date extensions.
Discussion took place regarding staff-recommended MFS modification, previous
Commission approval regarding shared-use paths, proposed MFS being lower due to new
methodology, mobility fees being the same as Impact Fees, shared-use routes replacing
existing sidewalks, connectors being low-speed facilities, FDOT funds, reviewing fee
schedules more frequently, fluidity of the proposed plans, considering future pathways
designated for bicyclists and pedestrians only, creating designated bicycle lanes, and
methodology cycles being reviewed every four years.
There was consensus to approve moving forward with Scenario 2 to not include the
East Toledo Blade/Price Boulevard Phase III project.
Mr. Speake spoke to the suggested mobility fee rate outside the Activity Center rate
being the City-wide rate.
There was consensus to have one fee outside the Activity Centers and make the rate
the City-wide rate based on the suggested Mobility Fee rate.
B.
Discussion and Possible Direction Regarding Submitting
a
Charter
Amendment to Electors Related to the City Manager’s Authority to Sign
and Enter Into Contracts and Applications on Behalf of the City.
Mayor Emrich announced the item.
Mr. Fletcher introduced the item.
Ms. Slayton spoke to the Charter Review Advisory Board's (CRAB) recommendation to
allow the City Manager to sign all contracts and legal recommendation to establish a limit
and set the limit within the procurement code.
Ms. Williams provided
a
presentation including efficient and effective operations,
legislative oversight, purchasing and contract thresholds for Commission approval in other
municipalities, and procurement authority.
Discussion took place regarding Commission briefings, CRAB recommendation, existing
agreements that resulted in majority vote and not consensus, signing authority for Union
contracts and design agreements, and option to place the item on voter referendum.
Mr. Fletcher and Ms. Slayton spoke to the proposal being a two-step process including a