Discussion took place regarding subject matter experts.
Dr. Kles continued her presentation regarding cultural resource management and types of
archeological surveys.
Discussion continued regarding different zones in the City.
Dr. Kles continued her presentation regarding local historical surveys and interest in
archeological sites.
Discussion continued regarding the various phases of surveys.
Dr. Kles continued her presentation regarding nationally registered resources and burial
sites within the waterways.
Discussion continued regarding being proactive in surveying sites.
Dr. Kles continued her presentation regarding cultural resource management archeology,
its significance and its relation to community development, taphonomy or "forensic"
archeological work on local sites, differences between middens and push piles and
dealing with historical records discrepancies and archeological findings,
suggestions for future archeological endeavors.
and offered
Discussion continued regarding the handling of human remains, financial implications of
furthering archeological surveying, securing funding, and collaborating with local
academia.
Dr. Kles responded to several questions regarding archeological investigation of the
Myakkahatchee slew. M. Kalev spoke to review and update of county records, predictive
model usage, and the impact on identifying new sites, and use of modern technology for
testing new areas.
7. Unfinished Business
A.
Discussion
and
Possible
Action
Regarding
Recommendations
or
Advisements to City Commission
Chair English announced the item.
Mr. Kalev spoke to overview.
Discussion took place regarding water treatment center release from recent storms, past
weather and environmentally significant events, future solutions, potential harm to
environment, potential presenter, environmental scorecard, and expansion.
B.
Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Advising the City Commission
on the Significance of Trees for Carbon Sequestration
Chair English announced the item.
Mr. Kalev provided update regarding memorandum.
There was no discussion.
C.
Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the Presentation of MSDS
Chemical Products Used by Public Works and Parks and Recreation
Departments