Commission questions and discussion took place regarding reasonable sunset
timeframe, number of nonconforming signs, temporary versus permanent signs,
hurricane damaged signs, personal expression signs, sign maintenance, annexation,
and maintenance code.
There was consensus to not require removal of nonconforming signs.
Ms. Barnes continued the presentation regarding outdoor advertising signs (billboards)
including existing billboards, concerns, signage examples, staff recommendation, and
Planning and Zoning Advisory Board (PZAB) recommendation.
Commission questions and discussion took place regarding sign ownership, provisions
for annexed properties, sign regulation authority, billboard property ownership,
residential property along I-75, and change in billboard content.
There was consensus to allow no more than the 15 existing billboards on I-75.
Commission questions and discussion took place regarding agenda backup, temporary
signs in rights-of-way, legal opinion for issuing permits for special events, signage
requirement criteria, equal protections, city advertisement of events, free speech zone,
cost for pickup of signs, and equal consideration and restrictions.
There was consensus to direct the City Attorney to perform a legal opinion to
allow issuing permits for signs in the right-of-ways when the applicant has
special event.
a
Mr. Golen spoke to subject matter expert.
Commission questions and discussion continued regarding additional options.
There was consensus to direct the City Attorney and staff to work together to
provide other viable options to allow these kinds of event signage to be able to
be placed within the City.
Public Comment:
Josh Smith: Expressed opposition to eliminating signage.
Recess was taken from 12:50 p.m. until 1:00 p.m.
Commission questions and discussion continued regarding definitions, vehicle signs,
accessory to legally improved site, setbacks, pattern book, prohibited uses, snipe signs,
election signs, certificate of zoning compliance, and fence signs.
There was consensus to allow fence signs on private property.
Commission questions and discussion continued regarding approval of sign variances,
major/minor variance, and zoning hearing officer considerations and process.
Consensus was requested to have Commission approve variances/modifications
versus zoning hearing officer.
Commission questions and discussion continued regarding review by advisory boards
and stakeholders.
Mr. Fletcher spoke to discussion with Bill Gunnin.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT:
There was no public comment.
Commission discussion took place regarding wildlife signs.
4. ADJOURNMENT: