(SMH) at Sumter Development Master Plan (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
Chair Waugh announced the item.
Ms. Faust read the Petition title and swore in those wishing to provide testimony.
Chair Waugh called for disclosure of ex-parte communications.
Board Member Patricoski disclosed
member.
a site visit and discussion with hospital board
Board Member Irizarry disclosed a site visit and discussion with hospital board member.
Chair Waugh, Vice Chair Ludos, and Board Member Hester disclosed no ex-parte
communications.
Ms. Faust stated there were no aggrieved parties.
Jackson Boone, Boone Law Firm, being duly sworn, spoke to ex-parte disclosures,
provided
a presentation including location, future land use and zoning, surrounding
zoning, entitlements, development master plan (DMP) distinctions from other DMPs,
building height, lot coverage, minimum open space standards, access points,
implementation of Sarasota Memorial Hospital (SMH) branded architecture, DMP
expiration, property use areas, drainage and maintenance easements, landscape buffers,
sidewalk, modification requests, and staff review.
A motion was made by Vice Chair Ludos, seconded by Board Member Baer, to
extend the presentation time 20 minutes. The motion carried on the following vote:
6 -
Yes:
Board Member Hester, Vice Chair Ludos, Board Member Irizarry, Board Member
Patricoski, Chair Waugh and Board Member Baer
Patrick Healy, Kimley Horn, being duly sworn, provided a presentation including drainage
and storm water, impact on surrounding areas, model and evaluation, raising site out of
floodplain, storm water retention, and exhibiting environmental resource permit.
Christopher Hatton, Kimley Horn, being duly sworn, provided a presentation including
traffic study overview.
Mr. Boone continued his presentation including traffic analysis Phase I, consistency with
Comprehensive Plan and Uniform Land Development Code (ULDC), staff conditions, and
requested approval.
Mr. Flores, being duly sworn, provided a presentation including overview, staff review,
neighborhood meeting, future land use designation, zoning designation, concept plan,
modification requests, consistency with Comprehensive Plan, notice of public hearings,
and staff recommendations.
There were no rebuttals by the Applicant or Staff.
There was no public comment.
Board questions and discussion took place regarding storm water retention, traffic
concerns, flooding concerns, comparison to Wellen Park site, and modification to include
expiration date.
Jeffrey Boone, Boone Law Firm, being duly sworn, spoke to lack of healthcare
designation.