Chair Waugh announced the item.
Mr. Powell read the petition by title only.
Ms. Barnes provided
a presentation including overview, background, site information,
review process, staff analysis, consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Unified Land
Development Code (ULDC), and Florida Statutes, property rights element, public school
facilities element, public notices, neighborhood meeting, and staff recommendations.
Discussion took place regarding property location, zoning changes, property owner
appeal process, walking trail impact, wetlands, and environmental impact.
There was no public comment.
Chair Waugh closed the public hearing and requested a motion.
A
motion was made by Board Member Patricoski, seconded by Board Member
Wolf, to recommend that the City Commission approve PFLU-25-02427 via
Ordinance No. 2025-22 and find that the amendment is consistent with the
standards and intent of the City of North Port Comprehensive Plan and Florida
Statutes. The motion carried on the following vote:
5 -
Yes:
Board Member Irizarry, Board Member Patricoski, Chair Waugh, Board Member
Keogh and Alternate I Wolf
1 - Board Member Bagaev
No:
2 - Vice Chair Ludos and Alternate II Gortz
Absent:
B. PRZ-25-0242 Consideration of Petition No. PRZ-25-02428 rezone 3.30 acres from
Environmental (EC) to Agriculture (AG) for property located at 4043
Jennings Boulevard (QUASI-JUDICIAL)
Chair Waugh announced the item and stated this is a quasi-judicial hearing.
Mr. Powell read the petition by title only and swore in those wishing to provide testimony.
Chair Waugh called for disclosure of ex-parte communications.
Board Member Wolf, Board Member Irizarry, Board Member Keogh, and Board Member
Patricoski disclosed no ex-parte communications.
Chair Waugh disclosed
a
site visit and conversations with Myakka State Forest
personnel regarding walking trail status.
Board Member Bagaev disclosed a site visit.
Mr. Powell stated there were no aggrieved parties.
Ms. Barnes, being duly sworn, provided a presentation including overview, background,
site information, review process, staff analysis, consistency with Comprehensive Plan,
Unified Land Development Code (ULDC), and Florida Statutes, property rights element,
public notices, neighborhood meeting, and staff recommendations.
There was no rebuttal by Staff.
There was no public comment.