TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission
FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager
TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding the City Manager's Annual Evaluation.
Recommended Action
Option 1: Discussion and possible action regarding the City Manager's annual evaluation.
City Commission Options
Option 1: Discussion and possible action regarding the City Manager's annual evaluation.
* Pros: Fosters a culture of recognition and appreciation, allows for competitive compensation for experience and knowledge, and allows for increased job satisfaction.
* Cons: Encumbers funding that could be utilized elsewhere.
Option 2: Discussion regarding the City Manager's annual performance evaluation, without action to approve an annual increase for City Manager, Jerome Fletcher.
* Pros: Allows funding to be utilized elsewhere.
* Cons: Decrease in job satisfaction and competitive compensation.
Background Information
Pursuant to the City Manager's Employment Agreement, Article II, Section G (2), the City Commission must conduct a performance evaluation of the City Manager annually during the month of September at a public meeting. The City Manager has provided a self-evaluation for the Commission which is included along with the Commissioners' evaluations for consideration of compensation adjustments based on the results of the employee's annual performance evaluations.
Strategic Plan Pillar
Good Governance
Financial Impact
Per Article II, Section 6 (2) of the Agreement, the Commission may consider adjustments to compensation based on the results of the performance evaluation. Funding for any potential increase will be included in the Fiscal Year 2025 budget in account no. 001-0800-512-1100.
Procurement
Not applicable.
Attachments:
1. Evaluation Summary
2. Mayor Stokes Evaluation
3. Vice Mayor Emrich Evaluation
4. Commissioner Langdon Evaluation
5. Commissioner Petrow Evaluation
6. Commissioner Duval Evaluation
7. City M...
Click here for full text