Skip to main content
File #: 26-0555    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/16/2026 In control: City Commission Regular Meeting
On agenda: 4/7/2026 Final action:
Title: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding a Recommendation to Close City Manager Report Item #591 Related to the Irdell Terrace Property, Parcel No.1141260522.
Attachments: 1. September 24, 2024, Meeting Minutes, 2. Resolution 2024-R-25, 3. December 9, 2025, Meeting Minutes, 4. City Manager Report - March 2026, 5. Parks & Recreation Master Plan Park Type Standards
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

TITLE: Discussion and Possible Action Regarding a Recommendation to Close City Manager Report Item #591 Related to the Irdell Terrace Parcel No. 1141260522.


Recommended Action

Option 1: Close City Manager Report item #591 related to Irdell Terrace parcel no. 1141260522 and take no further action related to park use.

City Commission Options

Option 1: Close City Manager Report item #591 related to Irdell Terrace, parcel no. 1141260522 and take no further action related to park use.

* Pros:
o Aligns with the Parks & Recreation Master Plan Park Type Standards which deem the site unsuitable for park development due to acreage and designated elements.
o Reinforces the operational priority of stormwater management and ensures uninterrupted access for maintenance.
o Provides resolution to a long-standing directive and removes an inactive item from the City Manager Report.
o Maintains consistency and clarity in long-range planning for parks.

* Cons:
o Eliminates future development of the Irdell Terrace parcel for recreational use unless conditions change significantly.


Option 2: Pursue recreational development opportunities on Irdell Terrace parcel.

* Pros:
o Could identify limited or non-traditional recreational opportunities if the Commission wishes to explore them despite site constraints.

* Cons:
o Conflicts with the Parks & Recreation Master Plan's finding that the property is not suitable for park development.
o There is no available budget for park development, making any new recreational project infeasible at this time.
o May create public expectations for park amenities that cannot realistically be delivered due to size, shape, and stormwater infrastructure constraints.
o Diverts staff resources from higher-priority parks projects identified in the Master Plan.



Background Information

During the September 24, 2024, Road & Drainage Di...

Click here for full text