Skip to main content
File #: 25-2642    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/18/2025 In control: City Commission Regular Meeting
On agenda: 9/23/2025 Final action:
Title: Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Venice, North Port, Sarasota, and Punta Gorda; the Counties of Charlotte, and Sarasota; and the Town of Longboat Key for Reciprocal use of Building Code Department Personnel
Attachments: 1. Interlocal Agreement
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

TO:                                           Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

 

FROM:                      A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

 

TITLE:                     Interlocal Agreement Between the Cities of Venice, North Port, Sarasota, and Punta Gorda; the Counties of Charlotte, and Sarasota; and the town of Longboat Key for Reciprocal Use of Building Code Department Personnel

 

 

Recommended Action

 

Approve the new interlocal agreement for Building Department services between the cities of Venice, North Port, Sarasota, and Punta Gorda; the counties of Charlotte, and Sarasota; and the town of Longboat Key for reciprocal use of building code department personnel.

 

City Commission Options

 

Option 1: Approve the new interlocal agreement for Building Department services between the cities of Venice, North Port, Sarasota, and Punta Gorda; the counties of Charlotte and Sarasota; and the town of Longboat Key for reciprocal use of building code department personnel

                     Pros: Regional cooperation enhances capacity to respond to emergencies (e.g., hurricanes), particularly in damage assessments and rebuilding efforts.

                     Cons: Interlocal agreements can become bureaucratically complex, with potential disagreements over cost-sharing, service levels, or accountability.

 

Option 2: Deny the new interlocal agreement for Building Department services between the cities of Venice, North Port, Sarasota, and Punta Gorda; the counties of Charlotte, and Sarasota; and the town of Longboat Key for reciprocal use of building code department personnel.

                     Pros: Allows jurisdictions to continue providing services specifically suited to the needs and preferences of their local community and development patterns.

                     Cons: Hinders opportunities for coordinated responses to regional challenges such as disaster recovery, labor shortages, or major development projects.

 

Background Information

 

The original Interlocal Agreement was entered into by the City of North Port, the City of Venice, and Charlotte County. Under Florida Statutes § 163.01(11), an interlocal agreement, and any subsequent amendments, must be filed with the clerk of the circuit court of each county where a party to the agreement is located, and such filing is a condition of the agreement’s effectiveness. Consistent with that statutory requirement, Section 12 of the original Interlocal Agreement says, “this Agreement shall take effect upon the filing of the fully executed copies with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Sarasota and Charlotte County”. The original Interlocal Agreement was recorded in Sarasota County on October 3, 2008, but was never filed in Charlotte County.

 

In 2009, an Addendum to the original Interlocal Agreement was executed to add Sarasota County as a party. While this Addendum was filed in Sarasota County, it was never filed in Charlotte County, in violation of the same statutory and contractual requirements noted above. Additionally, two other addendums to the original Interlocal Agreement were drafted but were never fully executed.

 

Upon receiving notification to add the Town of Longboat Key to the Interlocal Agreement, a legal request was submitted to the City Attorney’s Office. In turn the City Attorney’s office requested that Charlotte County record the original Interlocal Agreement and the fully executed Addendum to proceed and cure the outstanding issue. Instead, Charlotte County provided the attached revised Interlocal Agreement and asked all parties to execute a new Interlocal Agreement.

 

Strategic Plan Pillar

 

Safe Community

 

Financial Impact

 

Not applicable

 

Procurement

 

Not applicable

 

 

Attachments:

1.                      Interlocal Agreement

 

 

 

Prepared by:                       Katrina Romano, Business Operations Manager, Development Services Department

 

Department Director:                       Alaina Ray, AICP, Director, Development Services Department