Legislation Details

File #: 26-1233    Version: 1 Name:
Type: General Business Status: Draft
File created: 9/24/2026 In control: Road and Drainage District Governing Body
On agenda: 12/8/2026 Final action:
Title: A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of North Port, Florida Authorizing the Purchase of Real Property Located on Delmar Drive and Described as Lot 11, Block 618, of the 14th Addition to the Port Charlotte Subdivision, Sarasota County Property Appraiser Parcel Identification Number 0969061811; Incorporating Recitals; Providing for Filing of Documents; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for Severability; and Providing an Effective Date.
Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 07-R-11, 2. Resolution No. 07-R-52, 3. Brokers Opinion of Value, 4. Property Information Sheet
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

TITLE: A Resolution of the City Commission of the City of North Port, Florida
Authorizing the Purchase of Real Property Located on Delmar Drive
and Described as Lot 11, Block 618, of the 14th Addition to the Port
Charlotte Subdivision, Sarasota County Property Appraiser Parcel
Identification Number 0969061811; Incorporating Recitals; Providing
for Filing of Documents; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for
Severability; and Providing an Effective Date.


Recommended Action

Approve Resolution No. as presented, authorizing the purchase of real property located on Delmar Drive, North Port, Florida, 34291.


City Commission Options

Option 1: Approve Resolution No. as presented, authorizing the purchase of real property located on Delmar Drive, North Port, Florida, 34291.
.
Pros: Undeveloped, vegetated land absorbs stormwater better than built areas, reducing flood risk for nearby neighborhoods.
Pros: Reinforces North Port’s image as a nature-focused community and aligns with regional conservation initiatives.
Cons: Preserved lands still require management: invasive species control, trail upkeep, signage, habitat monitoring, safety checks, and staff oversight.
Cons: If the land has been disturbed, the city may need to invest in cleanup, erosion repair, or ecological restoration


Option 2: Deny Resolution No. as presented.
Pros: The city avoids costs and staffing needs related to land management, invasive species control, habitat restoration, or trail upkeep.
Pros: If privately owned, the land continues generating tax revenue rather than becoming exempt under city ownership.
Cons: Sensitive creekside ecosystems may be impacted by clearing, construction, or neglect.
Cons: Developed land along the creek could worsen downstream flooding issues due to loss of permeable surfaces.


Background Information

In 2006 and 2007, the City ...

Click here for full text