Legislation Details

File #: 26-0279    Version: 1 Name:
Type: General Business Status: Passed
File created: 12/26/2025 In control: City Commission Workshop
On agenda: 1/5/2026 Final action: 1/5/2026
Title: Discussion and Possible Direction Regarding the City of North Port's Mission, Vision, Values, Logo and Taglines.
Attachments: 1. Presentation, 2. Brand Strategy, 3. Branding Logos Part 1, 4. Branding Logos Part 2
TO: Honorable Mayor & Members of the North Port Commission

FROM: A. Jerome Fletcher II, ICMA-CM, MPA, City Manager

TITLE: Discussion and Possible Direction Regarding the City of North Port's Mission, Vision, Values, Logo and Taglines.


Recommended Action

Provide direction and guidance on Mission, Vision and Values following the suggested rewrite provided, all of which have been based on community feedback, competitor analysis, insights report and brand strategy documentation.

Provide opinions on logo and tagline suggestions, which are based on community feedback, competitor analysis, insights report and brand strategy documentation.

City Commission Options

Mission, Vision and Values:

* Option 1: Agree to current suggested Mission, Vision and Values.
o Pros: Reflects extensive work already completed using community feedback, competitor analysis, the insights report and brand strategy documentation. Allows the project to move forward on schedule, supporting timely internal alignment and next-phase deliverables. Provides clarity and consistency for staff, partners and the community by establishing an agreed foundation. Reduces the risk of prolonged revision cycles that could delay implementation.
o Cons: Limits opportunity for Commissioners to reflect individual perspectives. May require later adjustments if additional priorities or nuances emerge during strategy workshops. Perception that changes were approved with minimal modification may raise questions from some community members.

* Option 2: Make minor amends to suggested Mission, Vision and Values.
o Pros: Enables Commissioners to refine language while preserving alignment with research, community input and strategic direction. Allows clarification of tone, emphasis, or phrasing without reopening the full development process. Maintains project momentum while ensuring the final content reflects Commission guidance. Balances efficiency with governance oversight.
o Cons: Minor revisions may still req...

Click here for full text